- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:19:49 +0100
- To: vojtech.toman@emc.com
- Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
On 8 October 2010 13:10, ? wrote: > The implicit output ports on compound steps are always > unnamed. They don't inherit the name of the last step's primary > output port. If you want to refer to p:choose's output port by > name, you have to provide an explicit output port in p:when: Ok, so when the spec says: "If the selected subpipeline has a primary output port", it refers to the p:when subpipeline itself, but I was looking at the output port of my:step. Makes sense. Thank you! -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/
Received on Friday, 8 October 2010 12:20:43 UTC