- From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:39:40 -0500
- To: "'James Sulak'" <jsulak@gmail.com>, "'Norman Walsh'" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: "'XProc Dev'" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
make would only run Makefile if there weren't also "makefile," which if I recall correctly, has precedence. I wouldn't recommend repeating that little convention, but maybe you could allow for a couple of different options here. -Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: xproc-dev-request@w3.org > [mailto:xproc-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of James Sulak > Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:32 AM > To: Norman Walsh > Cc: XProc Dev > Subject: Re: Default pipeline? > > pipeline.xpl? > > -James > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > > If you run "make" without a make file, it looks for "Makefile". > > If you run "ant" without a build file, it looks for "build.xml". > > > > If you run an XProc processor without specifying a > pipeline, should it > > look for a default pipeline. What should it be called? > > > > Be seeing you, > > norm > > > > -- > > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The human race consists of the > > http://nwalsh.com/ | dangerously insane and such as are > > | not.--Mark Twain > > > >
Received on Saturday, 13 March 2010 00:40:11 UTC