- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:30:14 +0000
- To: David <dlee@calldei.com>
- Cc: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
I don't think you can go far wrong with: "pipeline.xproc" :) On 11 March 2010 15:21, David <dlee@calldei.com> wrote: > I doubt Norm is thinking this is something that belongs in the XProc spec. > > First off an implementation should recommend a suffix ... > Since xproc pipelines are xml they could be > .xml > > why not ? > > > But following the XSLT convention maybe > .xpl > .xproc > .xpipeline > > I think a lot of people are using .xpl but maybe an implementation should > suggest something ? > > Once you decide on the prefered implementation suffix ... > the "default pipeline" might be ... > > xproc.<suffix.> > pipeline.<suffix> > standard input .... > <implementation name>.<suffix> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------- > David A. Lee > dlee@calldei.com > http://www.calldei.com > http://www.xmlsh.org > > > On 3/11/2010 9:30 AM, Henry S. Thompson wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Norman Walsh writes: >> >> >>> >>> If you run "make" without a make file, it looks for "Makefile". >>> If you run "ant" without a build file, it looks for "build.xml". >>> >>> If you run an XProc processor without specifying a pipeline, should it >>> look for a default pipeline. What should it be called? >>> >> >> Maybe, but that's for implementations to document, not the spec. to >> require. >> >> I would expect to configure the specific name in the >> site-configuration for my pipeline processor, I guess. That way it >> could be absolute or relative. . . >> >> ht >> - -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of >> Edinburgh >> Half-time member of W3C Team >> 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 >> Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk >> URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ >> [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged >> spam] >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iD8DBQFLmP6akjnJixAXWBoRApK7AJ4l8vcjECyBmKU746I/0znUxw4mWwCfbPiu >> Ivn7LUijFXh2eIbLGrCQtAQ= >> =WkBc >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > > -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 15:30:49 UTC