- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:30:50 +0000
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> If you run "make" without a make file, it looks for "Makefile".
> If you run "ant" without a build file, it looks for "build.xml".
>
> If you run an XProc processor without specifying a pipeline, should it
> look for a default pipeline. What should it be called?
Maybe, but that's for implementations to document, not the spec. to
require.
I would expect to configure the specific name in the
site-configuration for my pipeline processor, I guess. That way it
could be absolute or relative. . .
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFLmP6akjnJixAXWBoRApK7AJ4l8vcjECyBmKU746I/0znUxw4mWwCfbPiu
Ivn7LUijFXh2eIbLGrCQtAQ=
=WkBc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 14:31:21 UTC