- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:24:52 +0200
- To: David Cramer <david@thingbag.net>
- CC: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 13 August 2010 10:25:27 UTC
David Cramer wrote: > Thanks! That's a much more attractive option than messing with Saxon 6.5. > > Btw., which 1.0 engine(s) balked at this version? I don't recall, probably xsltproc or Xalan. Also there are some edge cases which are not supported when processed by XSLT 2.0, like generation of separate files for longdesc. It has been quite while since I was working on this code. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 13 August 2010 10:25:27 UTC