Re: EXProc - editorial: use different prefixes for File Utils and XPath functions from Florent Georges on 2010-04-22 (xproc-dev@w3.org from April 2010)

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:23:11 +0100
To: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <p2xebaca5bf1004220823u13d6ce9fs1f48961dc67dc935@mail.gmail.com>

On 22 April 2010 12:10, ? wrote:

> Oh, I agree with that. But I was referring to using the same prefix for
> two different namespace URIs in the EXProc specifications. The File
> Utils steps and the XPath extension functions are currently in two
> different namespaces, but they are both referred to using the same
> prefix "pfx" in the text.

  Oh right.  My fault, I read your message too fast, sorry about that.
 So yes, of course :-)

-- 
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/

Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:29:18 UTC