- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:53:21 +0100
- To: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
- Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
On 22 April 2010 09:36, ? wrote: > I noticed that the specifications at EXProc.org use the same namespace > prefix for the File Utils steps and the XPath extension functions: "pxf" > I think that for reducing the confusion of the readers/users, it would > be better to use a different prefix for either the File Utils stuff or > the XPath extension functions. Well, that's a tricky one. If we get too much different namespaces, people will just be confused. If we do not have enough, things will be less maintainable. Personally, I think it is better to have too less than too much, but that's just my own point of view. Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:55:43 UTC