- From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@mulberrytech.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:31:11 -0400
- To: XProc-dev@w3.org
Norm, At 02:44 PM 4/16/2010, you wrote: >Rob Koberg <rob@koberg.com> writes: > > I did not run it. But I meant to say the xsl:element in the XSL is > > interpreted differently than literal result elements. It is treated > > more as a start tag/end tag. How? No clue :) > >Close. What happens is the namespace gets excluded so there's no binding >for c: in the stylesheet so it fails with an undeclared prefix. That's what I guessed :-), but then I second-guessed myself along the lines of why should the namespace be excluded? Is there a rule that says it should, on the grounds that it has been inherited? If so, what's the rationale for this rule? (If it's that such a namespace usually doesn't belong in the stylesheet, isn't that killing a gnat with a blowtorch?) Cheers, Wendell ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@mulberrytech.com Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 20:31:44 UTC