- From: Rob Koberg <rob@koberg.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:27:59 -0700
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
How about the exclude-inline-prefixes="c" in p:declare-step because it is interpreted differently than literal result elements? -Rob On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > This pipeline fails. Without running it, can you figure out why? > > <p:declare-step xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc" version="1.0" > xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-step" > exclude-inline-prefixes="c" > name="main"> > > <p:input port="parameters" kind="parameter"/> > <p:output port="result"/> > > <p:xslt> > <p:input port="source"> > <p:inline><doc/></p:inline> > </p:input> > > <p:input port="stylesheet"> > <p:inline> > <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" > xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc-step" > version="1.0"> > > <xsl:template match="/"> > <xsl:element name="c:wrapper"> > <xsl:apply-templates/> > </xsl:element> > </xsl:template> > </xsl:stylesheet> > </p:inline> > </p:input> > </p:xslt> > > </p:declare-step> > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Language is by its very nature a > http://nwalsh.com/ | communal thing; that is, it expresses > | never the exact thing but a > | compromise--that which is common to > | you, me, and everybody.--T. E. Hulme >
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 17:28:32 UTC