- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:41:15 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m27ho8hav8.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Wendell Piez <wapiez@mulberrytech.com> writes: [...] > Fair enough, but what's the best way to construct a pipeline that > either (a) aggregates two documents into one and then transforms the > aggregate, There are a handful of ways to do that. What kind of aggregation do you want? * <p:wrap-sequence> will put them in the same document * You can <p:insert> one into the other. * If you pass both of them to source port of the <p:xslt> step then they'll be available in the default collection I saw p:pack mentioned later in this thread (which I haven't worked my way entirely through, so apologies if I'm recovering old ground). For two single documents, p:pack doesn't do much usefully more than p:wrap-sequence. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Two paradoxes are better than one; they http://nwalsh.com/ | may even suggest a solution.--Edward | Teller
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:41:49 UTC