- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:44:08 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m2sk6xq6t3.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Wendell Piez <wapiez@mulberrytech.com> writes: > 1. Can I (how would I) call out to another pipeline (maybe in another > XProc instance?) whose input would be my source document and whose > results would be input to a new transformation? If the transformation is known in advance, you just declare that pipeline and then use it: <p:pipeline ...> <p:declare-step type="my:subpipe"> <p:input port="source"/> <p:output port="result"/> ...whatever it does goes here... </p:declare-step> ...whatever setup you want to do... <my:subpipe> <p:xslt> ... If you need the *pipeline* to vary, then you're off in extension territory for XProc V1.0. XML Calabash supports an eval step that will do it. > 2. How do I calculate the name of a secondary input document from > that of a primary input? (I gather I can just do > "replace(base-uri(),'dir1/','dir2/')" or the like, but where and how?) Probably in p:load: <p:load> <p:with-option name="href" select="replace(...)"/> </p:load> > 3. How do I combine these, to run a transformation that takes as its inputs: > a. the results of my primary source file run through my > subordinate pipeline; > b. the results of a secondary source (whose name is either > parameterized for my XProc engine or derived from the name of my > primary source) through the same subordinate pipeline. Does what I showed above help? > Any illustrations or mockups, however sketchy, would be very welcome. I've recently documented a couple of more complex pipelines http://norman.walsh.name/2010/04/13/flickrWithXProc http://norman.walsh.name/2010/03/18/rng2dtd Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | 'I have done that,' says my memory. 'I http://nwalsh.com/ | cannot have done that'--says my pride, | and remains adamant. At last--memory | yields.-- Nietzsche
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:44:45 UTC