- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:16:39 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:17:20 UTC
Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes: > Shouldn't it be instead the following, to use the step name instead > of Logger.toString(): > > runtime.info(logger, step.getNode(), "Running " + step.getName()); Yes. I've been meaning to fix that for weeks. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Endurance is frequently a form of http://nwalsh.com/ | indecision.--Elizabeth Bibesco
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 18:17:20 UTC