- From: Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:39:44 -0400
- To: "'xproc-dev@w3.org'" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
> metaprogramming? Yes, precisely. A pipeline for processing pipelines, i.e. a metapipeline. /Roger On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org> wrote: > > > > Interesting idea Roger! > > > > It occurs to me that if one was to create an XProc pipeline for XProc pipelines, it would provide an "authoritative reference guide" to all XProc processor implementers! > > > > /Roger > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > Imagine creating an XProc processor (such as Calabash or Calumet). > > > > That processor must read in an XML document (the .xpl file) and process it. This >processing involves taking the XML document (the .xpl file) through a number of steps, and the output is one or more XML documents. > > > > It seems to me that it should be possible to write an XProc pipeline for XProc pipelines. > > > > Has anyone done this? > > > > /Roger
Received on Friday, 29 May 2009 18:40:17 UTC