- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:32:12 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m23aaqpi3n.fsf@nwalsh.com>
mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com> writes: >> Alas, I think that would just trade a great big nested p:try/p:catch >> for a great big p:choose... > > A small win, but a win ! Fair enough. > Let's try to solve your use case > > Here are the ways to solve it with the lesser code > 1) First, is to say that selecting an unbound variable will generate > un unbound variable (a bit tricky) No, I don't think that's practical. It could be made to work for select expressions that contain only a single variable reference, but what about more complex expressions? > 2) To add an attribute on p:with-option that says > @bound-like-this-option="$foo" ; if foo is bound then the variable > will be bound and the value will be the content of the select and will > not be bound if $foo isn't bound Yeah, I guess that's an option. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | When the situation is desperate, it is http://nwalsh.com/ | too late to be serious. Be | playful.--Edward Abbey
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 17:35:04 UTC