Re: Detecting unbound options

"Henry S. Thompson" <> writes:
>> Yuck! But can we really live with this...
> For sure not.
> The most straightforward approach would be to add p:bound? as an XPath
> extension function.

Alas, I think that would just trade a great big nested p:try/p:catch
for a great big p:choose...

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <> | Part of thinking is its cruelty, aside            | from its contents. It is the process of
                              | detachment from everything else, the
                              | ripping, the wrenching, the sharpness
                              | of cutting.--Elias Canetti

Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 14:07:29 UTC