Re: Detecting unbound options

"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> writes:
>> Yuck! But can we really live with this...
>
> For sure not.
>
> The most straightforward approach would be to add p:bound? as an XPath
> extension function.

Alas, I think that would just trade a great big nested p:try/p:catch
for a great big p:choose...

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Part of thinking is its cruelty, aside
http://nwalsh.com/            | from its contents. It is the process of
                              | detachment from everything else, the
                              | ripping, the wrenching, the sharpness
                              | of cutting.--Elias Canetti