- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:33:52 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 11:34:32 UTC
mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com> writes: > Are you suggesting that we eventually end up needing a construct to > test if a variable is bounded ? No. After more thought, I'm suggesting that the concept of unbound options is a mistake. As a (SIGNIFICANT) convenience to users, and consistent with languages like XSLT, I think an option with no binding should get a default value. Since we've decided that variables and parameters must be strings in XProc 1.0, I propose the empty string as that default value. Effectively "" becomes the default default for options. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | He who fails to become a giant need not http://nwalsh.com/ | remain content with being a | dwarf.--Ernest Bramah
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 11:34:32 UTC