- From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:56:30 +0200
- To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- Cc: "xproc-dev@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Roger, On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org> wrote: > > > 2. Why is it an error to include p:output in an atomic step? > Your are allowed to use p:output in the "signature" of a step When you use it, then connection is made by the steps that "reads from" this port It was a choice to make * having only "input" * having only "output" * havign both the WG decided to stick to "input" only since it doesn't remove features Xmlizer
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 09:57:10 UTC