example given in section 2.1.1, need clarification

• From: Raphaël Burgener <raphael.burgener@epfl.ch>
• Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:30:59 +0100
• To: xproc-dev@w3.org
• Message-ID: <49B58A93.2010808@epfl.ch>

Hello everyone,

I don't understand the example given in section "2.1.1 Step names". Why 
does the p:choose get the name "!1.2" ? "!1.1" seems to be more coherent.

-Raph

Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 09:19:12 UTC