- From: David A. Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:57:24 -0400
- To: Florent Georges <fgeorges@gmail.com>
- CC: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>, Toman_Vojtech@emc.com, xproc-dev@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 23:58:05 UTC
This makes good sense to me, it depends on the context. I could imagine a context where it should be relative to a DB (say in eXists or ML). David A. Lee dlee@calldei.com http://www.calldei.com http://www.xmlsh.org 812-482-5224 Florent Georges wrote: > 2009/7/29 David A. Lee wrote: > > >> I've done this before in custom code, and its a great idea to >> be able to bundle "script data" (say xproc, xquery, xslt) with >> the JAR files. It was particularly useful when I had an >> .xquery file that needed to load a module but insisted on >> looking in the current directory instead of the .jar file ! >> ug. >> > > >> But should it be the "default"? That would add yet more >> confusion, IMHO. >> > > Depends on the context IMHO. That should be the default in the > Facade class aimed to be used in a Java EE environment, and the > current directory should be used in the Facade class used by the > command line frontend. > > IMHO. Regards, > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 23:58:05 UTC