- From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:18:20 -0400
- To: <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC787104A20EB@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>
I think I am going to make the command-line and Java API in sync (=resolving against cwd). The "baseuri" command-line switch also sounds like a good/useful idea to me. Thanks Florent and David for your feedback. Regards, Vojtech ________________________________ From: David A. Lee [mailto:dlee@calldei.com] Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:10 PM To: Toman, Vojtech Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org Subject: Re: Calumet and relative URIs I agree your argument is better. Especially in the light of a command line interface like calumet -i source=../data/doc.xml http://foo/pipelines/pipeline.xpl and the coresponding Java. new Source("../data/doc.xml") both "seem like they should" come from the filesystem. I think it "seems the same way" to me now, too... :) Now there's always room for a "third way", that is from the command line allow a -baseuri used for resolution. I do that in many xmlsh commands to allow "both ways" to be used so I'm always right :) (or always wrong ... :) say calumet -baseuri http://foo/pipelines -i source=../data/doc.xml pipeline.xpl In the java code this would do the appropriate URI resolution against an explicit base.
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 14:19:53 UTC