- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:47:55 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m2bpqf1elg.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> writes: > One of the organizations I support is considering using XProc and > using Calabash. They asked me some questions that I was not able to > answer: > > 1. How confident are you in the quality and correctness of the > Calabash implementation? Uhhhhh. I'm reasonably confident that it produces correct results, but there are known bugs: http://code.google.com/p/xmlcalabash/issues/list and I'm sure there are unknown bugs too. It's 'beta', at best. > 2. In your experience is Calabash thread-safe, multiprocessor-safe? I've made no effort to make XProcRuntime objects thread safe. I'm not even confident that they're serially reusable. But if you create two XProcRuntimes, I don't think there'd be any issue with running pipelines through them in different threads. The current implementation is single-threaded, so I don't think multiprocessors are relevant. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A man may fulfill the object of his http://nwalsh.com/ | existence by asking a question he | cannot answer, and attempting a task he | cannot achieve.--Oliver Wendell Holmes
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 18:54:14 UTC