- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:22:13 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m28wlqt6u2.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> writes: > I would like to confirm with you some terminology. > > A .xpl file is the: > - pipeline definition > - workflow definition > - process definition > > (Any of these terms may be used) I prefer "pipeline file" or "pipeline definition". > Calabash and Calumet are: > - pipeline engines > - workflow engines Again, I strongly prefer "pipeline" over "workflow". Yes, you can do some simple workflows with XProc pipelines, but it's not designed to satisfy the requirements of more complex workflow use cases. > The XML files that are processed are the: > - cases > > (This is the term used by the Workflow Management Coalition [1]) I call the XML files that are processed "documents". > XProc Reference Model: > > http://www.xfront.com/xproc-reference-model.gif > > Do you agree with these terms, and with the reference model? Pipeline processors don't usually write XPL files so I think that arrow should be one way. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | O for a Muse of fire, that would ascend http://nwalsh.com/ | / The brightest heaven of invention, / | A kingdom for a stage, princes to act / | And monarchs to behold the swelling | scene!--William Shakespeare, Henry V
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 23:32:14 UTC