- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:07:49 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 13:08:35 UTC
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > I'm fixing the same bugs in fixed-alternative and http-request-006 now :-) I think I've fixed http-request-006 now. The CR/LF pair that precedes the separator is, by my reading of the RFC, part of the separator. There's also some confusion (in my mind) about how to handle the text->XML conversion of CR/LF pairs. So, maybe I got the "actual" result wrong. But I don't think so... Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Walking on water and developing http://nwalsh.com/ | software to specification are easy as | long as both are frozen.--Edward V. | Berard
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 13:08:35 UTC