- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:05:32 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m2ljq81rcz.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes: > Confused. I think this is an improvement. Steps may have parameter input ports, on which parameters can be passed. A step can have zero, one, or many parameter input ports, and each parameter input port can have zero or more parameters passed on it. If more than one parameter with the same name is passed to any given parameter input port, only the last value specified will be available to the step; the names of the parameters passed to the step are unique on each port. Parameters with the same name can be passed to different ports, the uniqueness constraint on names only applies to the parameters passed on each individual port. Please let me know if you don't find this satisfactory. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is seldom that any liberty is lost http://nwalsh.com/ | all at once.--David Hume
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 15:06:16 UTC