- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:05:32 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m2ljq81rcz.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
> Confused.
I think this is an improvement.
Steps may have parameter input ports, on which parameters can be
passed. A step can have zero, one, or many parameter input ports,
and each parameter input port can have zero or more parameters
passed on it. If more than one parameter with the same name is
passed to any given parameter input port, only the last value
specified will be available to the step; the names of the parameters
passed to the step are unique on each port. Parameters with the same
name can be passed to different ports, the uniqueness constraint on
names only applies to the parameters passed on each individual port.
Please let me know if you don't find this satisfactory.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is seldom that any liberty is lost
http://nwalsh.com/ | all at once.--David Hume
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 15:06:16 UTC