- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:03:53 +0200
- To: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Cc: James Sulak <jsulak@gmail.com>, XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
2009/4/7 mozer wrote: > I agree with your analysis, but you miss one important point in it : > you may end up having to give a name to a bunch of component for that, > which might become troublesome at some point Maybe. If we say that most of p:with-option are bound to the same port than their step, most of which are in turn bound to the default readable port, I think that this is actually a good default. And after more thoughts, I guess this is the case. -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 00:04:33 UTC