- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:01:02 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: "XProc Dev" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
2008/9/24 Norman Walsh wrote: > "Florent Georges" writes: >> I didn't followed XProc really closely for a long time (I think the >> last time I've read a draft was while flying to XML Prague...) But is >> there any mechanism similar to XSLT's import and import precedence, >> allowing one user to overload a standard stylesheet to plug his own >> logic and customization? > No, but I don't think the XProc model really supports that kind of > interchange. Unlike XSLT, which is a collection of templates, pipeline > steps are tightly connected. Not the same way than in XSLT, but what for instance if we were able to plug a processor on the link between two processors? That would enable one to create a proxy over (in front of or behind are maybe better) a processor. For example that would allow to make XInclude processing at one point in a standard pipeline that didn't support that initially. I am just thinking aloud... That's maybe something we'd be better experimenting after the XProc REC, to get real usage for XProc 1.1... -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:01:43 UTC