James Garriss <> writes:

> I apologize for being johnny-come-lately, but has the WG considered support
> for NVDL, either in this version or the next version of XProc?
> Given support for all the other validation languages, NVDL seems like a
> logical fit to me.

We've talked about it, but I don't think any of us are expert enough
to tell if XProc can already handle all of NVDL or if we'd need a
p:nvdl step.

At this point, I think it's not likely to make it into V1.0. But if
someone knows what needs to be done, I'd love to hear about it.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <> | It'll cost you.            | 

Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 20:47:07 UTC