- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:38:56 -0400
- To: James Garriss <james@garriss.org>
- Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m2hc8cdu27.fsf@nwalsh.com>
James Garriss <james@garriss.org> writes: > If I were attempting to persuade someone to use XProc instead of writing > their own XML processing code, say in Java, would it be reasonable to say > that the ability to easily select various processors (this one for XSLT, > that one for XSD, some other one for Schematron, etc) and switch back and > forth among them is an advantage that XProc holds? Or would this merely be > (potentially) an advantage of one XProc processor over another? I think that's more likely to be an implementation-dependent feature. The advantage of XProc over Java is that you can mix and match the order of processes in a few minutes, without ever having to write a line of Java. This can potentially move a whole bunch of processing out of the hands of engineers and (more directly) into the hands of users. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Wit consists in seeing the resemblance http://nwalsh.com/ | between things which differ, and the | difference between things which are | alike.--Madame De Stæl
Received on Friday, 19 September 2008 15:39:39 UTC