- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:19:59 -0400
- To: James Garriss <james@garriss.org>
- Cc: "xproc-dev\@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m21vzgs268.fsf@nwalsh.com>
James Garriss <james@garriss.org> writes: > Excellent. My mistake was assuming that p:compare had a primary output. > What should have tipped me off as I read the spec? Is it that primary > equals false? From the spec: Yep, primary=false is the flag. > <p:declare-step type="p:compare"> > <p:input port="source" primary="true"/> > <p:input port="alternate"/> > <p:output port="result" primary="false"/> > <p:option name="fail-if-not-equal" select="'false'"/> <!-- > boolean --> > </p:declare-step> > > As to a working solution, you had the right idea, but as calabash informs > us: Attribute "step" not allowed on p:output. Instead, we can put a result > port in p:compare, like such: > > <p:compare fail-if-not-equal="true" name="compareBookstores"> > <p:input port="source"> > <p:pipe step="main" port="source"/> > </p:input> > <p:input port="alternate"> > <p:pipe step="main" port="alternate"/> > </p:input> > <p:output port="result"/> > </p:compare> No, that's not right. You aren't allowed to put a p:output on an atomic step. Does Calabash miss that too? Sigh. Another day, another bug :-) The output port is part of the declaration of the p:compare step. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A proof tells us where to concentrate http://nwalsh.com/ | our doubts.-- Anonymous
Received on Friday, 19 September 2008 13:20:41 UTC