- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:45:04 -0500
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m2ej17akyn.fsf@nwalsh.com>
ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes: > Norman Walsh writes: >> Perhaps we should allow the match pattern to match document nodes as >> well so that you can wrap all the leading PIs, comments, and >> whitespace. > > I'm not sure. There's an easy workaround: > > <p:wrap match="/node()" . . . > > Isn't that sufficient? No, that'll fail as Mohamed pointed out, however, I think this will work: <p:wrap match="/node()" group-adjacent="true()"/> > Strictly speaking, > > <p:wrap match="/" wrapper="f"/> > > should wrap the document node itself, which ain't right, right? I suppose. We'd have to make that a special case, I guess, technically. It occurs to me that if you want to wrap a whole document, you can use p:wrap-sequence, too. So there's nothing that we *need* to do here, it's only a question of whether we think this is worth doing to violate the users expectation of least surprise. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Some books are undeservedly forgotten, http://nwalsh.com/ | none are undeservedly remembered.--W. | H. Auden
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2008 13:45:49 UTC