Re: Tests recently changed with "Hidden" URL assumption ...

"David A. Lee" <> writes:

> I have discovered that some tests have changed (I think recently)

Not very recently.

> I liked it the way it was before where there were no such hidden requirements.
> Making the input URL's relative is great, but only if you can
> somehow manage comparing the outputs so they dont depend on the
> previous assumptions.

I guess I'd be open to suggestions on that point, but for the purposes
of comparison, it was expedient to simply run the tests from the

For my own purposes, I sometimes run the tests locally while I'm
debugging and I just ignore the failures that I know are caused by

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <> | 'Heartless Cynics,' the young men            | shout, / Blind to the world of Fact
                              | without; / 'Silly Dreamers,' the old
                              | men grin / Deaf to the world of Purpose
                              | within.--W. H. Auden

Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2008 03:19:39 UTC