- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:40:03 +0000
- To: "XProc Dev" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
2008/12/15 David A. Lee <dlee@calldei.com>: > My read on this is that its slightly better then saying nothing. > > This gives implementations a specific code to use if it cant do something > for "security" reasons. > Saying much more would vastly complicate the spec +1 Perhaps saying just what you've said would be better, i.e. " it is implementation dependent, and if an implementation can't execute a step for security reasons, use this error code" I.e. just enough. I think the CR at the moment says too much! regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Monday, 15 December 2008 17:40:46 UTC