Re: Schematron for xproc validation

"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
> I think Schematron could do a good job, but listing the 'rules' could
> take a while!

I think Schematron could do it, but I agree, some of the rules would
be pretty hairy. I find RNG validation covers enough of the common
errors to be sufficient for my needs.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If you are losing your leisure, look
http://nwalsh.com/            | out! You may be losing your
                              | soul.--Logan Pearsall Smith