- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:46:55 -0500
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m27i63lpdc.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes: > When should we choose one over the other? If you happen to want a pipeline that: 1. Has a single non-sequence input 2. Has a single non-sequence output 3. And allows parameters then p:pipeline is a convenient syntactic shorthand for the p:declare-step that would provide the same features. We expect this to be a common case, so I'd probably suggest that most folks start with p:pipeline most of the time. As it happens, I prefer to be more explicit so I prefer p:declare-step. But I'm weird. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The delivering of knowledge in distinct http://nwalsh.com/ | and disjointed aphorisms doth leave the | wit of man more free to turn and toss, | and to make use of that which is so | delivered to more several purposes and | applications.--Sir Francis Bacon
Received on Saturday, 13 December 2008 21:47:39 UTC