- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:08:08 +0000
- To: "XProc Dev" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
2008/12/11 Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>:
> "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
>> Surely p:stepName and foreign:stepName should be
>> different by your previous logic?
>
> It's a string, but:
>
> The step-type string must have the form of a QName; the QName is
> expanded into a name using the namespace declarations in scope for
> the expression.
>
> it's turned into a QName, so the prefix is irrelevant.
So p:step-available("Hello World") is valid?
Wouldn't the namespace be obtained from the environment in
which the function is called?
Stealing the text from 2.7.1
"The step-type string must have the form of a QName; the QName is
expanded into a name using the namespace declarations in scope for the
expression. "
I think that helps.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:08:55 UTC