- From: David A. Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:42:07 -0500
- To: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>, <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Excellent. They seem to have been added after starting this discussion. Thats good :) Of course you can ADD a context to p:with-option even if the default were <p:empty/> > One interesting data point > I looked at all the published "required" tests use of p:with-option > Not a single one of them used a context sensitive expression > (out of 42 > p:with-option uses). > Atleast not that I could find. By the way, there are a couple of recent tests that do this now: base-uri-001.xml base-uri-002.xml preserve-base-uri-001.xml I agree, it may not be convincing at all, but at least have some tests that use context sensitive p:with-option. And I am sure we will have more (as a matter of fact, I am writing one myself at the moment :) Regards, Vojtech
Received on Monday, 8 December 2008 14:42:46 UTC