Re: binding primary output in a declare-step

"James Sulak" <jsulak@gmail.com> writes:
>
> does not?  I think the two pipelines should be equivalent, if I
> understand things properly.

You do. It's a bug. Fixed now, I think.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Nothing ever becomes real till it is
http://nwalsh.com/            | experienced--even a proverb is no
                              | proverb to you until your life has
                              | illustrated it.-- Keats