- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:11:11 +0000
- To: "XProc Dev" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
2008/12/7 Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>: > Consider the role of an atomic step in a pipeline. It accepts some > number of inputs and produces some number of outputs. It's a black > box. It doesn't make any sense for *the step* to control where its > output goes, that's the job for pipeline as a whole. Not explicit in the CR? Unless I missed it? How'm I supposed to intuit this Norm? With a pipeline of a single atomic step I'm thinking I am controlling where it's output goes, i.e. they are one and the same thing? Hence I see that as step input from a.xml identity output to b.xml /step That seems quite logical to me.. Yet clearly doesn't fit the model you have. I guess it's down to the lack of symmetry. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Sunday, 7 December 2008 18:11:46 UTC