- From: David A. Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:04:37 -0500
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, "XProc Dev" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
This is really great stuff ... I cant wait to start contributing ... ( although right now I'm at 0 passes ... maybe 1 by end of day :) Suggestion. For future usability and comparisons I'd really like to see some kind of performance metrics in these reports. We all know absolute numbers are misleading at beast, but if interpreted with some wisdom they can be useful. Example: In the <processor> section (or a new optional section) a section for the environment run on such as CPU (maybe with some optional sub-details for things like cpu vendor, disk size, number of CPU's etc) OS RAM Then for each test the realtime for the test execution (but of course not the results collection). For now these would be prety meaningless as the tests are almost all very small. But as we create more tests that are more complex the numbers would be very useful. Alternatively ... maybe this is more valuable as a seperate report entirely with performance benchmarks as the goal not spec compliance. -David ----------------------------------------------------------- David A. Lee dlee@calldei.com http://www.calldei.com
Received on Friday, 5 December 2008 17:05:22 UTC