Sunday, 20 November 2011
Saturday, 19 November 2011
Thursday, 17 November 2011
- Re: "XML Schema specifies just syntax" versus "XML Schema specifies semantics"
- Re: "XML Schema specifies just syntax" versus "XML Schema specifies semantics"
Wednesday, 9 November 2011
- Re: "XML Schema specifies just syntax" versus "XML Schema specifies semantics"
- Re: "XML Schema specifies just syntax" versus "XML Schema specifies semantics"
- Re: "XML Schema specifies just syntax" versus "XML Schema specifies semantics"
- Re: "XML Schema specifies just syntax" versus "XML Schema specifies semantics"
- "XML Schema specifies just syntax" versus "XML Schema specifies semantics"
Sunday, 6 November 2011
Friday, 4 November 2011
- Re: A valuable lesson on the difference between XML Schemas and ontologies
- Re: A valuable lesson on the difference between XML Schemas and ontologies (UNCLASSIFIED)
- Re: A valuable lesson on the difference between XML Schemas and ontologies
- A valuable lesson on the difference between XML Schemas and ontologies
- Re: Using assert in a complexType with complexContent
- RE: Is this reasonable: classify each element as either an Object or property
- Re: Using assert in a complexType with complexContent
- Re: Is this reasonable: classify each element as either an Object or property
- Re: How to define a complexType so that derived types can have simple content or complex content?
Thursday, 3 November 2011
- Re: How to define a complexType so that derived types can have simple content or complex content?
- Is this reasonable: classify each element as either an Object or property
- Using assert in a complexType with complexContent
- Re: How to define a complexType so that derived types can have simple content or complex content?
- Re: How to define a complexType so that derived types can have simple content or complex content?
- Re: How to define a complexType so that derived types can have simple content or complex content?