xmlschema-dev@w3.org from October 2009 by date

Thursday, 29 October 2009

• [ANN] Altova announces v2010 of the MissionKit tool suite Liz Andrews

Monday, 26 October 2009

• Re: redefine and target namespace noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: redefine and target namespace Henry S. Thompson
• Re: redefine and target namespace Florent Georges
• Re: redefine and target namespace Henry S. Thompson

Sunday, 25 October 2009

• Re: redefine and target namespace Florent Georges
• RE: redefine and target namespace Michael Kay
• redefine and target namespace Florent Georges

Thursday, 22 October 2009

• Re: Resolution of "ref" attribute in case of <override> Kevin Braun
• RE: Resolution of "ref" attribute in case of <override> Michael Kay
• Re: Resolution of "ref" attribute in case of <override> C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Wednesday, 21 October 2009

• Resolution of "ref" attribute in case of <override> Kevin Braun

Tuesday, 20 October 2009

• Re: Tools to Generate XSD from Sample Instances George Cristian Bina
• Set up Craig, Janell
• RE: Tools to Generate XSD from Sample Instances Michael Kay
• Re: Tools to Generate XSD from Sample Instances XMLSchema at XML4Pharma
• Tools to Generate XSD from Sample Instances Tsao, Scott

Monday, 19 October 2009

• RE: XML schema Michael Kay
• Re: XML schema Bence Takács
• Re: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Henry S. Thompson

Sunday, 18 October 2009

• RE: XML schema Michael Kay
• XML schema btakacs

Friday, 16 October 2009

• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Michael Kay
• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Michael Kay
• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Michael Kay

Tuesday, 13 October 2009

• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] Two ways to create interleaved, any-order content ... are they identical? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Monday, 12 October 2009

• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Michael Kay
• Re: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Henry S. Thompson
• [XML Schema 1.1] Two ways to create interleaved, any-order content ... are they identical? Costello, Roger L.
• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Michael Kay
• Re: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Henry S. Thompson

Friday, 9 October 2009

• RE: xsd ambigious Neill, Andrew
• Re: xsd ambigious Pete Cordell
• RE: xsd ambigious Neill, Andrew
• Re: xsd ambigious Pete Cordell

Thursday, 8 October 2009

• Re: Fall back for missing xsi:type? Kevin Braun
• RE: xsd ambigious Neill, Andrew
• RE: xsd ambigious Neill, Andrew
• Re: xsd ambigious Pete Cordell
• Re: xsd ambigious George Cristian Bina

Wednesday, 7 October 2009

• xsd ambigious Neill, Andrew

Tuesday, 6 October 2009

• Re: Fall back for missing xsi:type? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Fall back for missing xsi:type? Kevin Braun

Monday, 5 October 2009

• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Peter Geraghty

Saturday, 3 October 2009

• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Michael Kay
• Re: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? XML4Pharma

Friday, 2 October 2009

• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Michael Kay
• Re: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Dennis Sosnoski
• Purpose of requirement in 3.16.6.2 Derivation Valid (Restriction, Simple) in XSD 1.1? Kevin Braun
• Re: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? XMLSchema at XML4Pharma

Thursday, 1 October 2009

• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Michael Kay
• RE: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Michael Kay
• Re: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Escalation mechanism for different interpretation of W3C XML-Schema specification ? Boris Kolpackov

Last message date: Thursday, 29 October 2009 19:39:06 UTC