Saturday, 30 May 2009
Friday, 29 May 2009
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Many questions about openContent
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Many questions about openContent
- XML schema with recursive SimpleType
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Many questions about openContent
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Many questions about openContent
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Many questions about openContent
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Many questions about openContent
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Many questions about openContent
- RE: When will there be a complete implementation of XML Schema 1.1?
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Many questions about openContent
- [XML Schema 1.1] Many questions about openContent
Thursday, 28 May 2009
- RE: XML XSD Validation
- Re: XML XSD Validation
- XML XSD Validation
- RE: When will there be a complete implementation of XML Schema 1.1?
- When will there be a complete implementation of XML Schema 1.1?
- RE: Motivations for restricting the "all" group
- Re: Motivations for restricting the "all" group
- RE: Motivations for restricting the "all" group
- RE: Motivations for restricting the "all" group
- Motivations for restricting the "all" group
Saturday, 23 May 2009
Friday, 22 May 2009
Thursday, 21 May 2009
Wednesday, 20 May 2009
Monday, 18 May 2009
Sunday, 17 May 2009
Friday, 15 May 2009
- Comments about XSV
- RE: Validating XPath queries
- Re: Validating XPath queries
- Validating XPath queries
Thursday, 14 May 2009
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] The XPath in <assert> cannot "look up" the XML tree, right?
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] What does ##defined and ##definedSibling mean?
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] What does ##defined and ##definedSibling mean?
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] What does ##defined and ##definedSibling mean?
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] What does ##defined and ##definedSibling mean?
- [XML Schema 1.1] What does ##defined and ##definedSibling mean?
Wednesday, 13 May 2009
- Re: [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
Tuesday, 12 May 2009
- Re: [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
- Re: [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
- Re: [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
- [XML Schema 1.1] I respectfully recommend these changes to <assert> and <alternative>
Monday, 11 May 2009
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] XPath in <alternative> cannot look up or down the tree, correct?
- [XML Schema 1.1] XPath in <alternative> cannot look up or down the tree, correct?
Tuesday, 5 May 2009
Monday, 4 May 2009
- VC-Filter, a demonstrator for the XSD vc:* attributes (was Re: [XML Schema 1.1] Is vc:facetAvailable only an attribute of xs:element? (Not an attribute of xs:simpleType?))
- Re: XML Schema 1.1 validators?
- XML Schema 1.1 validators?
Sunday, 3 May 2009
- RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Using doc() in xs:assert ... the referenced document needs a schema?
- Re: Alternative tags in element?