xmlschema-dev@w3.org from July 2009 by date

Thursday, 30 July 2009

• Re: Are these two datetime values equivalent? Kevin Braun
• RE: Are these two datetime values equivalent? Michael Kay
• Re: Are these two datetime values equivalent? Andrew Welch
• Re: Are these two datetime values equivalent? Kevin Braun
• Are these two datetime values equivalent? Costello, Roger L.
• RE: [Updated] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Michael Kay
• RE: [Updated] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Costello, Roger L.
• Re: [Updated] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Wednesday, 29 July 2009

• RE: Fw: [Updated] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Costello, Roger L.
• RE: [Updated] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Costello, Roger L.
• RE: [Updated] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: [Updated] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Costello, Roger L.
• Re: Fw: [Updated] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Dave Peterson
• RE: [Updated] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Michael Kay
• Fw: [Updated] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: [Updated] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Comment of section 2.2 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Monday, 27 July 2009

• Comment of section 2.2 Pete Cordell

Thursday, 23 July 2009

• Setting a base element within the subclass David Letchworth

Friday, 24 July 2009

• [Updated] XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Costello, Roger L.

Thursday, 23 July 2009

• RE: Use complex type many places Michael Kay

Wednesday, 22 July 2009

• Use complex type many places Scott, Shannon
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] I need an example that illustrates the usefulness of xs:error Michael Kay
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] I need an example that illustrates the usefulness of xs:error Costello, Roger L.
• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] I need an example that illustrates the usefulness of xs:error C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] I need an example that illustrates the usefulness of xs:error C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] I need an example that illustrates the usefulness of xs:error Mukul Gandhi
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] I need an example that illustrates the usefulness of xs:error Costello, Roger L.
• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] I need an example that illustrates the usefulness of xs:error Mukul Gandhi

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

• [XML Schema 1.1] I need an example that illustrates the usefulness of xs:error Costello, Roger L.
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] What problem is this solving: the ability to define multiple targetNamespaces in a single schema Michael Kay
• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] What problem is this solving: the ability to define multiple targetNamespaces in a single schema C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] What problem is this solving: the ability to define multiple targetNamespaces in a single schema C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] What problem is this solving: the ability to define multiple targetNamespaces in a single schema noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: ANN: XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Monday, 20 July 2009

• [XML Schema 1.1] What problem is this solving: the ability to define multiple targetNamespaces in a single schema Costello, Roger L.
• RE: ANN: XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Costello, Roger L.
• RE: ANN: XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Saturday, 18 July 2009

• RE: ANN: XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Costello, Roger L.
• 3rd International Rules Challenge - Call for Submissions Yuh-Jong Hu
• Re: ANN: XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Mukul Gandhi

Friday, 17 July 2009

• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] No changes to derive-by-restriction, right? (just a simplification of its description in the specification) Paul Kiel
• Re: ANN: XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• ANN: XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Costello, Roger L.
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] No changes to derive-by-restriction, right? (just a simplification of its description in the specification) Michael Kay
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] No changes to derive-by-restriction, right? (just a simplification of its description in the specification) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] No changes to derive-by-restriction, right? (just a simplification of its description in the specification) Paul Kiel

Wednesday, 15 July 2009

• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] No changes to derive-by-restriction, right? (just a simplification of its description in the specification) Michael Kay
• [XML Schema 1.1] No changes to derive-by-restriction, right? (just a simplification of its description in the specification) Costello, Roger L.

Tuesday, 14 July 2009

• [XML Schema 1.1] anySimpleType versus anyAtomicType? Costello, Roger L.
• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] defaultAttributes only apply within the schema file, not to imported or included schemas, correct? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• [XML Schema 1.1] defaultAttributes only apply within the schema file, not to imported or included schemas, correct? Costello, Roger L.

Wednesday, 8 July 2009

• Please delete past postings to forum PK

Monday, 6 July 2009

• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Is this a complete list of the new functionality? Michael Kay
• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] Is this a complete list of the new functionality? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Is this a complete list of the new functionality? Costello, Roger L.

Friday, 3 July 2009

• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] The <restriction> element is not declared in the DTD for XML Schema 1.1 Costello, Roger L.
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Is this a complete list of the new functionality? Michael Kay
• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] The <restriction> element is not declared in the DTD for XML Schema 1.1 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] The <restriction> element is not declared in the DTD for XML Schema 1.1 Costello, Roger L.
• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] The <restriction> element is not declared in the DTD for XML Schema 1.1 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] The <restriction> element is not declared in the DTD for XML Schema 1.1 Costello, Roger L.
• [XML Schema 1.1] Is this a complete list of the new functionality? Costello, Roger L.

Thursday, 2 July 2009

• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] The <restriction> element is not declared in the DTD for XML Schema 1.1 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• [XML Schema 1.1] The <restriction> element is not declared in the DTD for XML Schema 1.1 Costello, Roger L.

Wednesday, 1 July 2009

• Re: [XML Schema 1.1] Multiple <alternative> elements apply ... which one wins? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Multiple <alternative> elements apply ... which one wins? Michael Kay
• [XML Schema 1.1] Multiple <alternative> elements apply ... which one wins? Costello, Roger L.
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Multiple inheritable attributes with the same name ... who wins? Michael Kay
• [XML Schema 1.1] %XPathExpr; is not defined in the DTD for Schemas Costello, Roger L.
• RE: [XML Schema 1.1] Multiple inheritable attributes with the same name ... who wins? Costello, Roger L.

Last message date: Thursday, 30 July 2009 17:02:20 UTC