Wednesday, 30 April 2003
- (really the) same element with different attributes
- Re: schema upgrade
- Help please
- Re: schema upgrade
- schema upgrade
- Re: Why is this model non-deterministic?
- Why is this model non-deterministic?
Tuesday, 29 April 2003
- RE: Including the namespace namespace in the root element
- Including the namespace namespace in the root element
- ANNOUNCEMENT: XML Schema tool available for developers
Monday, 28 April 2003
Friday, 25 April 2003
Wednesday, 23 April 2003
- Re: [xml-dev] PSVI Question
- Re: How to derive from a mixed anyType?
- RE: How to derive from a mixed anyType?
Tuesday, 22 April 2003
- Re: [xml-dev] PSVI Question
- msxml bug
- Re: XSV crashed with the attached schema document
- Re: [xml-dev] PSVI Question
Monday, 21 April 2003
- PSVI Question
- Xerces threw exception on the attached schema document
- XSV crashed with the attached schema document
- Re: xs:redefine of a imported namespace group
- Re: a simple question about ComplexContent schema element
- Re: Things my mother never told me about types and equality...
- Re: Substitution group chains - which can be abstract?
Saturday, 19 April 2003
- RE: xs:redefine of a imported namespace group
- RE: xs:redefine of a imported namespace group
- RE: xs:redefine of a imported namespace group
- RE: XML Schema: Alternating "unbounded" elements
Friday, 18 April 2003
- RE: XML Schema: Alternating "unbounded" elements
- RE: XML Schema: Alternating "unbounded" elements
- Re: XML Schema: Alternating "unbounded" elements
- Re: root element in schema
- Re: XML Schema: Alternating "unbounded" elements
- RE: XML Schema: Alternating "unbounded" elements
- Re: XML Schema: Alternating "unbounded" elements
- RE: inconsistent union of patterns
- RE: inconsistent union of patterns
- RE: Substitution group chains - which can be abstract?
- RE: Substitution group chains - which can be abstract?
- Re: a simple question about ComplexContent schema element
- Re: Substitution group chains - which can be abstract?
- Re: inconsistent union of patterns
- RE: Substitution group chains - which can be abstract?
- Re: a simple question about ComplexContent schema element
- a simple question about ComplexContent schema element
- Re: Substitution group chains - which can be abstract?
Thursday, 17 April 2003
- XML Schema: Alternating "unbounded" elements
- Re: Things my mother never told me about types and equality...
- RE: Things my mother never told me about types and equality...
- Things my mother never told me about types and equality...
- Re: Substitution group chains - which can be abstract?
- Re: Attributes vs. Elements for Code values
- RE: Attributes vs. Elements for Code values
- RE: How to derive from a mixed anyType?
- Substitution group chains - which can be abstract?
- How to derive from a mixed anyType?
- RE: Attributes vs. Elements for Code values
- Re: Attributes vs. Elements for Code values
- Re: Attributes vs. Elements for Code values
- Attributes vs. Elements for Code values
Wednesday, 16 April 2003
- PSVI Output
- root element in schema
- Re: List of union
- xml schema for tree structure
- [xmlschema-dev] <none>
Tuesday, 15 April 2003
- Re: List of union
- Re: Validating documents with ISO/IEC 15938-1 chapter 6 schema
- Re: Just want to make sure I understand anyType correctly
- Just want to make sure I understand anyType correctly
- Re: Validating documents with ISO/IEC 15938-1 chapter 6 schema
- RE: Validating documents with ISO/IEC 15938-1 chapter 6 schema
- Re: Validating documents with ISO/IEC 15938-1 chapter 6 schema
- RE: Validating documents with ISO/IEC 15938-1 chapter 6 schema
- Re: Content Constraints in Table Rows
- Re: attributeGroups and anyAttribute
- Re: Validating documents with ISO/IEC 15938-1 chapter 6 schema
- Re: List of union
- RE: different attribute value sets for the same element ref?
- Re: different attribute value sets for the same element ref?
- Re: xs:redefine of a imported namespace group
- RE: different attribute value sets for the same element ref?
- Content Constraints in Table Rows
Monday, 14 April 2003
- RE: different attribute value sets for the same element ref?
- RE: different attribute value sets for the same element ref?
- attributeGroups and anyAttribute
- Re: different attribute value sets for the same element ref?
- Re: anyAttribute and ##targetNamespace question
- different attribute value sets for the same element ref?
- anyAttribute and ##targetNamespace question
Saturday, 12 April 2003
Friday, 11 April 2003
Thursday, 10 April 2003
- RE: Is defining a local element and element ref with same name in complexType valid
- Is defining a local element and element ref with same name in complexType valid
- RE: #any or #other namespace for any element
- Question regarding the use of xs:gMonth
Wednesday, 9 April 2003
Tuesday, 8 April 2003
- #any or #other namespace for any element
- Re: HELP Required in XML validation against XSD schema for Email and Phone number
- Validating documents with ISO/IEC 15938-1 chapter 6 schema
Monday, 7 April 2003
- Re: HELP Required in XML validation against XSD schema for Email and Phone number
- Referencing common constants
Saturday, 5 April 2003
Friday, 4 April 2003
- Re: List of union
- Make xsi:type a list of QNames?
- restriction query - XML Schema
- RE: Schematron and XSD validator
- Schematron and XSD validator
- RE: restrict attribute value
Thursday, 3 April 2003
- RE: How to pass the right value by "xsl:value select=" to URL in the generated HTML page
- RE: How to pass the right value by "xsl:value select=" to URL in the generated HTML page
- RE: How to pass the right value by "xsl:value select=" to URL in the generated HTML page
- How to pass the right value by "xsl:value select=" to URL in the generated HTML page
- restrict attribute value
- Re: List of union
- Re: List of union
- RE: loading xsd schema seperately for validating the xml Document
- loading xsd schema seperately for validating the xml Document
- Re: List of union
- Re: union of anyAttribute namespace constraints
- XML Schema Unit Test (SUT) Upgraded
Wednesday, 2 April 2003
- List of union
- union of anyAttribute namespace constraints
- extensibility for enumeration item in simple type
- [xmlschema-dev] <none>
- Re: Atleast one element should be present in ComplexType.
- Re: Wildcards and namespace constraints. What about the local name?
- Re: Atleast one element should be present in ComplexType.
- Re: attribute and restriction under same roof