- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:13:10 -0500
- To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Cc: "Xml-Dist-App@W3. Org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, xmlp-comments@w3.org
Anish: I believe your note accurately reflects the decision we made a couple of weeks ago. That was a decision I actively supported. As we discussed on the 12/14 telcon, I've since somewhat changed my position and new think it may be in the best interest of the community to focus on the ambiguity in the existing rec, and allow ourselves to make the envelope (but not the whole response) in the Req/Resp optional, and to document that in an erratum (see [1]). So, I suppose that's a request to reopen the just closed Rec39. The alternative, which I think I would also support, would be to publish a new (and arguably "incompatible") SOAP 1.2 2nd edition, SOAP 1.2b, SOAP 1.3 with the new feature and take it through a full CR/PR cycle. Sorry for any confusion caused by my change of position. Thank you. Noah [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2005Dec/0010.html -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org 12/14/2005 12:48 AM To: xmlp-comments@w3.org cc: "Xml-Dist-App@W3. Org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: Resolution of issue Rec39 At the 07-dec-2005 concall the XMLP WG decided to close issue Rec39 [1] by including the requirement for an optional-response/empty HTTP entity-body in the new MEP/binding work that the WG is undertaking. The WG also decided that per the existing binding defined in SOAP 1.2 [2], it is not possible to send back an empty HTTP entity body for the non-fault case when using the request-response MEP. The reasons for this are listed in the email at [3]. -Anish Karmarkar on behalf of XMLP WG PS: as the person who raised this issue, I'm happy with the resolution. [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-rec-issues.html#x39 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part2-20030624/#soapinhttp [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2005Aug/0011.html
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2005 23:13:33 UTC