- From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 00:49:25 -0700
- To: xmlp-comments@w3.org
Per my AI here is the email that I had promised to send regarding the behavior of a requesting node on a 3XX redirection status code to a POST method. Table 17 in [1] lists the following as the 'Significance/Action' on receiving a 3XX status code -- "The requested resource has moved and the HTTP request SHOULD be retried using the URI carried in the associated Location header field as the new value for the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/ImmediateDestination property." and the next state defined is: "Init" It is unclear what this means for the "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/" MEP. There are several 3XX status codes which require different behavior (per HTTP). Specifically, 303 requires the requester to use the GET method on the resource, whereas typically for a 307 the requester will re-POST the same message at the new URI available in the Location HTTP header. If the requester uses a GET method on a 303, is the MEP still the request-response MEP? Table 16, (which describes the fields in the Init state), specifies that the HTTP method is set as per the "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method" which is unchanged after the 3XX response (the only thing that changes is the 'ImmediateDestination'). OR if a requester uses the GET method on receiving a 303 is it conformant to the SOAP HTTP binding as defined by SOAP 1.2, part 2: Adjunct. There seems to be conflict in trying to remain conformant to the HTTP spec and the SOAP HTTP binding when a 303 is received. It seems to me that an errata that clarifies that a 3XX may change the value of "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/features/web-method/Method" would allow implementations to be conformant to the HTTP spec and the SOAP HTTP binding. -Anish -- [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part2-20030624/#http-reqbindwaitstate
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2005 07:49:38 UTC