- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:06:11 +0200 (MEST)
- To: I18n WSTF <public-i18n-ws@w3.org>
- cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0409171551230.18508@gnenaghyn.vaevn.se>
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, A. Vine wrote: [issue 503 [1] covers the points 7 and 8 of your email [2]. ] The XMLP WG decided to close issue 503 by taking no action, with the following rationale: point 7: The processing model does not mandate knowning the HTTP caching mechanism, the use of the enclosed representation is application depend. It may be used like a local HTTP cache, and the example in 4.3.3 [3] is actually defining an extension to allow the application to use the enclosed resource representation as a local cache. point 8: It is up to the application to decide if the complete HTTP transaction (in that case, indicating that it resulted in a 404) is required, and it will then use an extension to carry that, or if the header will not be added. Please let the Working Group know if that resolution is acceptable or not as soon as possible. Regards, [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-cr-issues.html#x503 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2004Sep/0000.html [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-soap12-rep-20040826/#rep-http-headers -- Yves Lafon - W3C "Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."
Received on Friday, 17 September 2004 14:07:20 UTC