- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:19:37 -0700
- To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, <aphillips@webmethods.com>, "I18n WSTF" <public-i18n-ws@w3.org>, <xmlp-comments@w3.org>, <andrea.vine@sun.com>
- Cc: "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
Martin, Addison, Andrea, others from I18N, The XMLP WG decided to amend the text in Section 4.2.2 of the Resource Representation SOAP Header Block as we discussed below. The editors copy[1] reflects this change. I trust this satisfies your concerns and therefore resolves issue 502[2] Regards Martin Gudgin For the XMLP WG [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/06/Attachments/Representation.xml#rep- resource [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-cr-issues.html#x502 > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@w3.org] > Sent: 22 October 2004 00:42 > To: Martin Gudgin; aphillips@webmethods.com; I18n WSTF; > xml-dist-app@w3.org > Cc: Yves Lafon > Subject: RE: Closing Issue 502 ( was RE: Issue 502 is closed ) > > Hello Martin, others, > > The WS Task Force of the I18N WG has looked at your new text proposal > at its teleconference today and has decided that it > adequately addresses > our issue 502. > > Many thanks, Martin. > > P.S.: For the record, but unrelated to issue 502 (and not part of my > action that prompted me to send this mail), some people on our > group have made comments on the frequency, low > information value, > and potential for confusion especially to non-native readers, > of the words "information item". > > > At 01:29 04/10/22, Martin Gudgin wrote: > > > >Martin, > > > >Thank you for your detailed and comprehensive response. The current > >editors copy says: > > > >"The type of the resource attribute information item is > xs:anyURI. The > >value of the resource attribute information item is a URI that > >identifies the Web resource whose representation is carried in the > >rep:Representation element information item parent of the resource > >attribute information item. NOTE: the use of the xs:anyURI type > >anticipates the possibility that in the future schemes will > be developed > >that use IRI rather than URI naming for resources." > > > >I would be happy to change this to your text: > > > >"The type of the resource attribute information item is > xs:anyURI. The > >value of the resource attribute information item identifies the Web > >resource whose representation is carried in the rep:Representation > >element information item parent of the resource attribute > information > >item." > > > >What do others in the XMLP WG think? > >
Received on Friday, 29 October 2004 17:20:23 UTC