- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 11:04:33 +0200
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- CC: xmlp-comments@w3.org, Herve Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>, Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
I'm sorry but I think this is the wrong argument. Unless the WG has recently changed its mind about the resolution to issue 103, which I don't think it has, and I certainly have seen no record of it, the status quo is NOT what you are proposing, it is to stick with the resolution to issue 103. I don't want to be overly difficult, we may not want to reimplement the full resolution to issue 103, but at least we should be clear about it. Thank you, Jean-Jacques. Martin Gudgin wrote: > Jean-Jacques, > > You raised an issue, number 434[1] against SOAP 1.2 PR. The working > group discussed the issue and decided to close it with no action partly > due to being very late in the process but mainly because there was no > desire amongst the WG to change the status quo. > > I hope this resolution is satisfactory to you. If not, please let the > Working Group know ASAP. > > Regards > > Martin Gudgin > For the XMLP Working Group > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-pr-issues.html#x434
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2003 05:02:52 UTC