- From: Nilo Mitra (EUS) <Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:05:08 -0500
- To: "'xmlp-comments@w3.org'" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>, "'reagle@w3.org'" <reagle@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 11:05:51 UTC
Joseph: You raised the following issue against the SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer, which has been marked as LC issue 245 [1]: # Example 5b # <rpc:result>m:status</rpc:result> # <m:status>confirmed</m:status> # This is a very odd sort of construct. I know it's just an example, but is # this sort of thing expected to be the norm, I would expect: # <rpc:result><m:status>confirmed</m:status></rpc:result> The Primer follows the main specifications in this formulation; so your issue is really an issue against the Parts 1, 2 specifications. A similar concern against the main specifications has been raised in Issue #299 [2]. Therefore, I intend to close this issue from the point of view of the Primer, and will revise the example only if the main specifications change as a part of the resolution of Issue 299. I hope this is satisfactory. Thank you Nilo Mitra Editor, SOAP Primer [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x245 [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x299
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 11:05:51 UTC